EBF1 Limits the Numbers of Cochlear Hair and Supporting Cells and Forms the Scala Tympani and Spiral Limbus during Inner Ear Development.

Early B-cell factor 1 (EBF1) is a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor essential for the differentiation of various tissues. Our single-cell RNA sequencing data suggest that Ebf1 is expressed in the sensory epithelium of the mouse inner ear. Here, we found that the murine Ebf1 gene and its protein are expressed in the prosensory domain of the inner ear, medial region of the cochlear duct floor, otic mesenchyme, and cochleovestibular ganglion. Ebf1 deletion in mice results in incomplete formation of the spiral limbus and scala tympani, increased number of cells in the organ of Corti and Kölliker's organ, and aberrant course of the spiral ganglion axons. Ebf1 deletion in the mouse cochlear epithelia caused the proliferation of SOX2-positive cochlear cells at E13.5, indicating that EBF1 suppresses the proliferation of the prosensory domain and cells of Kölliker's organ to facilitate the development of appropriate numbers of hair and supporting cells. Furthermore, mice with deletion of cochlear epithelium-specific Ebf1 showed poor postnatal hearing function. Our results suggest that Ebf1 is essential for normal auditory function in mammals.

Dependence of Cochlear Duct Length Measurement on the Resolution of the Imaging Dataset.

HYPOTHESIS: Measurements of the cochlear duct length (CDL) are dependent on the resolution of the imaging dataset. BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown highly precise cochlear measurements using 3D-curved multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT). Thus far, however, there has been no systematic evaluation of the imaging dataset resolution required for optimal CDL measurement. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the dependence of CDL measurement on the resolution of the imaging dataset to establish a benchmark for future CDL measurements. METHODS: fpVCT scans of 10 human petrous bone specimens were performed. CDL was measured using 3D-curved MPR with secondary reconstruction of the fpVCT scans (fpVCT SECO ) and increasing resolution from 466 to 99 µm. In addition, intraobserver variability was evaluated. A best-fit function for calculation of the CDL was developed to provide a valid tool when there are no measurements done with high-resolution imaging datasets. RESULTS: Comparison of different imaging resolution settings showed significant differences for CDL measurement in most of the tested groups ( p < 0.05), except for the two groups with the highest resolution. Imaging datasets with a resolution lower than 200 µm showed lower intraobserver variability than the other resolution settings, although there were no clinically unacceptable errors with respect to the Bland-Altman plots. The developed best-fit function showed high accuracy for CDL calculation using resolution imaging datasets of 300 µm or lower. CONCLUSION: 3D-curved MPR in fpVCT with a resolution of the imaging dataset of 200 µm or higher revealed the most precise CDL measurement. There was no benefit of using a resolution higher than 200 µm with regard to the accuracy of the CDL measurement.

Enhancing cochlear duct length estimation by incorporating second-turn parameters.

Estimating insertion depth, cochlear duct length (CDL), and other inner ear parameters is vital to optimizing cochlear implantation outcomes. Most current formulas use only the basal turn dimensions for CDL prediction. In this study, we investigated the importance of the second turn parameters in estimating CDL. Two experienced neuro-otologists blindly used segmentation software to measure (in mm) cochlear parameters, including basal turn diameter (A), basal turn width (B), second-turn diameter (A2), second-turn width (B2), CDL, first-turn length, and second-turn length (STL). These readings were taken from 33 computed tomography (CT) images of temporal bones from anatomically normal ears. We constructed regression models using A, B, A2, and B2 values fitted to CDL, two-turn length, and five-fold cross-validation to ensure model validity. CDL, A value, and STL were longer in males than in females. The mean B2/A2 ratio was 0.91 ± 0.06. Adding A2 and B2 values improved CDL prediction accuracy to 86.11%. Therefore, we propose a new formula for more accurate CDL estimation using A, B, A2, and B2 values. In conclusion, the findings of this study revealed a notable improvement in the prediction of two-turn length (2TL), and CDL by clinically appreciable margins upon adding A2 and B2 values to the prediction formulas.

Comprehension of Cochlear Duct Length for Incomplete Partition Types.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative assessment of the cochlear duct length (CDL) and cochlear dimensions allows the selection of optimized implants. We aimed to evaluate the CDL measurements in incomplete partition (IP) defect patients and to create a reference to the literature. METHODS: Forty-one patients with IP (13 IP I, 23 IP II, and 5 IP III) and 30 controls were included in the study. The standardized cochlear image showing the basal turn in the most expansive plane was reconstructed from temporal high-resolution computed tomography images. Cochlear duct length measured manually (CDL-M) was measured by points placed consecutively on the lateral wall of the cochlea. The defined equations for estimating CDL (CDL measured according to Schurzig et al formula [CDL-Ɵ], CDL measured according to Escudé et al formula [CDL-E], CDL measured according to Alexiades et al formula [CDL-A]) were calculated from the same images. Cochlear duct length mean values obtained by each method were compared for each IP type. RESULTS: The longest CDL value was found in the control group, irrespective of the calculation method. Incomplete partition II cases had the most extended mean CDL among IP types. Incomplete partition III had the shortest CDL among all groups' CDL-M values. However, the mean CDL-M values of IP types I and III showed close results. There was no significant difference between the CDL-E and CDL-M values of the control group. Similarly, no significant difference was found between CDL-Ɵ and CDL-M values in IP type III cases. However, the results of other estimating formulations of all groups differed significantly from CDL-M values. CONCLUSION: Cochlear duct length differences were detected between the control group and IP subtypes. These differences should be considered when choosing the appropriate electrode length. Because the results of formulas estimating CDL may differ from CDL-M in both control and IP cases, it would be more appropriate to use manual measurements in clinical practice.

Determining optimal cochlear implant electrode array with OTOPLAN.

BACKGROUND: To achieve better speech performance following cochlear implantation (CI), measuring the patient's cochlear duct length (CDL) and determining the appropriate length of the CI array are important. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the CDL in CI patients after using the OTOPLAN software preoperatively and compare the results of angular insertion depth (AID) estimation by OTOPLAN and postoperative radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 105 Japanese CI patients with normal cochleae. We measured the CDL using OTOPLAN and the position of the tip channel of the electrode for each selected electrode array, and estimated the AID using the software. RESULTS: The mean CDL was 35.1 ± 1.6 mm. Preoperatively, the mean estimated AID was 580.3 ± 57.8°. Postoperative radiography revealed a mean AID of 583.0 ± 56.7°, demonstrating a strong linear correlation between the two measurements (R2 = 0.635). CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings revealed that CDL varies widely, which is consistent with previous studies. To achieve better speech perception, surgeons should select the appropriate length of CI electrode array based on the individual's CDL. Preoperative measurement of each CDL by OTOPLAN, which is clinically feasible and comparable to postoperative evaluation, can be used to ensure selection of the appropriate electrode array length.

Two Discrete Types of Tip Fold-Over in Cochlear Implantation Using Slim Modiolar Electrodes: Influence of Cochlear Duct Length on Tip Fold-Over.

OBJECTIVE: Precise electrode positioning is crucial for achieving optimal audiological outcomes in cochlear implantation. The slim modiolar electrode (SME), a thin, flexible, and precurved electrode, exhibits favorable modiolar proximity. However, tip fold-over can affect optimal electrode placement. Herein, we share our experiences with tip fold-over in SMEs and present an analysis of conditions that may predispose to tip fold-over. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. PATIENTS: In total, 475 patients (671 ears) underwent cochlear implantation using SMEs (Nucleus CI532 or CI632 from Cochlear) performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary center between June 14, 2018, and December 1, 2022. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative x-ray scans (cochlear view), operative records, and cochlear duct length (CDL) were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tip fold-over patterns on plain x-ray images (proximal versus distal). RESULTS: Electrode tip fold-over was observed in 18 (2.7%) of the 671 ears with SMEs. This fold-over occurred more frequently in cases with long CDL (>36 mm). Among the 14 cases with available initial x-rays before correction of the tip fold-over, half were classified as proximal and the other half as distal. A predilection for proximal tip fold-over was found in those with a CDL of 36 mm or longer, and longer CDLs were observed for proximal cases than for distal cases. Our pilot data suggest that identifying the type of tip fold-over can aid in correcting it more efficiently. CONCLUSIONS: Tip fold-over of SME does not occur uniformly and is more common in ears with long CDL. This tendency is particularly pronounced for the proximal type of tip fold-over. Therefore, preoperative measurement of the CDL and meticulous examination of intraoperative imaging are essential for customized correction.

Incomplete Partition Type II Cochlear Malformations: Delineating the Three-Dimensional Structure from Digitized Human Histopathological Specimens.

HYPOTHESIS: There are clinically relevant differences in scalae anatomy and spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) quantity between incomplete partition type II (IP-II) and normal cochleae. BACKGROUND: IP-II is a commonly implanted cochlear malformation. Detailed knowledge of intracochlear three-dimensional (3D) morphology may assist with cochlear implant (CI) electrode selection/design and enable optimization of audiologic programming based on SGN maps. METHODS: IP-II (n = 11) human temporal bone histological specimens were identified from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders National Temporal Bone Registry and digitized. The cochlear duct, scalae, and surgically relevant anatomy were reconstructed in 3D. A machine learning algorithm was applied to map the location and number of SGNs. RESULTS: 3D scalae morphology of the basal turn was normal. Scala tympani (ST) remained isolated for 540 degrees before fusing with scala vestibuli. Mean ST volume reduced below 1 mm 2 after the first 340 degrees. Scala media was a distinct endolymphatic compartment throughout; mean ± standard deviation cochlear duct length was 28 ± 3 mm. SGNs were reduced compared with age-matched norms (mean, 48%; range, 5-90%). In some cases, SGNs failed to ascend Rosenthal's canal, remaining in an abnormal basalward modiolar location. Two forms of IP-II were seen: type A and type B. A majority (98-100%) of SGNs were located in the basal modiolus in type B IP-II, compared with 76 to 85% in type A. CONCLUSION: Hallmark features of IP-II cochleae include the following: 1) fusion of the ST and scala vestibuli at a mean of 540 degrees, 2) highly variable and overall reduced SGN quantity compared with normative controls, and 3) abnormal SGN distribution with cell bodies failing to ascend Rosenthal's canal.

The Dependency of Cochlear Lateral Wall Measurements on Observer and Imaging Type.

HYPOTHESIS: Assessment techniques for the cochlear spatial lateral wall are associated with inter-rater variability, but derived clinical recommendations nonetheless offer value for individualized electrode selection. BACKGROUND: Anatomical variations influence the location of cochlear implant electrodes inside the cochlea. Preoperative planning allows individualization of the electrode based on characterization of the bony lateral wall. METHODS: The study used publicly available digitized temporal bones based on microslicing and computed tomography. Four experienced observers assessed the lateral wall applying manual tracing, linear regression scaling and elliptic-circular approximation methods in all modalities. Radial and height differences were computed in 90-degree steps from the round window center to the apex. Total length, total angular length, and tonotopic frequencies were computed for each reconstruction. RESULTS: Differences were found most pronounced between assessment methods in vertical direction across observers and imaging modalities. One of the five anatomies was consistently found to be of shorter cochlear duct length with estimation techniques yielding more conservative results compared with manual tracings. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment techniques for the bony lateral wall yield method, observer, and image modality related deviations. Automation of the anatomical characterization may offer potential in minimizing inaccuracies. Nonetheless, observers were consistently able to detect a smaller inner ear demonstrating the ability of current methods to contribute to an optimized choice of electrodes based on individual patient anatomy.

Accuracy of Preoperative Cochlear Duct Length Estimation and Angular Insertion Depth Prediction.

OBJECTIVE: In cochlear implantation with flexible lateral wall electrodes, a cochlear coverage of 70% to 80% is assumed to yield an optimal speech perception. Therefore, fitting the cochlear implant (CI) to the patient's individual anatomy has gained importance in recent years. For these reasons, the optimal angular insertion depth (AID) has to be calculated before cochlear implantation. One CI manufacturer offers a software that allows to visualize the AID of different electrode arrays. Here, it is hypothesized that these preoperative AID models overestimate the postoperatively measured insertion angle. This study aims to investigate the agreement between preoperatively estimated and postoperatively measured AID. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: Single-center tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing cochlear implantation. INTERVENTION: Preoperative and postoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The cochlear duct length was estimated by determining cochlear parameters ( A value and B value), and the AID for the chosen electrode was (i) estimated by elliptic circular approximation by the software and (ii) measured manually postoperatively by detecting the electrode contacts after insertion. RESULTS: A total of 80 HRCT imaging data sets from 69 patients were analyzed. The mean preoperative AID estimation was 662.0° (standard deviation [SD], 61.5°), and the mean postoperatively measured AID was 583.9° (SD, 73.6°). In all cases (100%), preoperative AID estimation significantly overestimated the postoperative determined insertion angle (mean difference, 38.1°). A correcting factor of 5% on preoperative AID estimation dissolves these differences. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an electrode visualization tool may lead to shorter electrode array choices because of an overestimation of the insertion angle. Applying a correction factor of 0.95 on preoperative AID estimation is recommended.

Method to estimate the basal turn length in inner ear malformation types.

The mathematical equations to estimate cochlear duct length (CDL) using cochlear parameters such as basal turn diameter (A-value) and width (B-value) are currently applied for cochleae with two and a half turns of normal development. Most of the inner ear malformation (IEM) types have either less than two and a half cochlear turns or have a cystic apex, making the current available CDL equations unsuitable for cochleae with abnormal anatomies. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the basal turn length (BTL) from the cochlear parameters of different anatomical types, including normal anatomy; enlarged vestibular aqueduct; incomplete partition types I, II, and III; and cochlear hypoplasia. The lateral wall was manually tracked for 360° of the angular depth, along with the A and B values in the oblique coronal view for all anatomical types. A strong positive linear correlation was observed between BTL and the A- (r2 = 0.74) and B-values (r2 = 0.84). The multiple linear regression model to predict the BTL from the A-and B-values resulted in the following equation (estimated BTL = [A × 1.04] + [B × 1.89] - 0.92). The manually measured and estimated BTL differed by 1.12%. The proposed equation could be beneficial in adequately selecting an electrode that covers the basal turn in deformed cochleae.

Interobserver variability of cochlear duct measurements in pediatric cochlear implant candidates.

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the proposed cochlear duct length estimation based on the cochlear 'A value'. Furthermore, we assessed the interobserver variability between radiology and otolaryngology attending physicians and otolaryngology trainees. METHODS: Thirteen pediatric cochlear implant candidates were retrospectively analyzed by three otolaryngology physicians (attending physician, second year, and fourth year trainees) and a radiology attending. The cochlear duct length was calculated based on the formula of Grover et al. The differences in acquired measurements between observers were compared using the Wilcoxon matched signed-rank test. RESULTS: The differences in measurements between the attending otolaryngologist and radiologist were not statistically different, while several significant differences were observed with regard to measurements of attending doctors compared to both residents. In particular, a significant difference between the second year otolaryngology resident and otolaryngology and radiology attending was observed for one side (right ear p = 0.034 and p = 0.012, respectively). Moreover, the fourth year resident calculated significantly different cochlear duct measurements when compared to the attending otolaryngologist (left ear p = 0.014) and radiologist (right ear p = 0.047). Interestingly, differently experienced otolaryngology residents provided significantly different measurements for both ears. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, cochlear duct length measurement according to the proposed method may be a reliable and cost-effective method. Indeed, otolaryngology training may be sufficient to provide measurements comparable to radiologists. On the other hand, additional efforts should be invested during otolaryngology training in terms of the evaluation of radiological imaging which may increase the capabilities of otolaryngology residents in this regard.

[Measuring the cochlea using a tablet-based software package: influence of imaging modality and rater background]. / Vermessung der Cochlea mittels eines Tablet-basierten Softwarepakets: Einfluss der Bildgebungsmodalität und des Untersucherhintergrunds.

BACKGROUND: Cochlear duct length (CDL) is subject to significant individual variation. In the context of cochlear implantation, adapting the electrode array length to the CDL is of potential interest, as it has been associated with improvements in both speech recognition and sound quality. Using a tablet-based software package, it is possible to measure CDL at the level of the organ of Corti (CDLOC) to select appropriate electrode array lengths based on individual cochlear anatomy. OBJECTIVE: To identify effects of imaging modality and rater background on CDL estimates. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and flat-panel volume CT (fpVCT) scans of 10 patients (20 cochleae) were analyzed using the OTOPLAN software package (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria). Raters were an otorhinolaryngology (ORL) specialist, an ORL resident, and an audiologist. To analyze effects of rater background and imaging modality on CDL measurements, linear mixed models were constructed. RESULTS: Measurements showed mean CDLOC(fpVCT) = 36.69 ± 1.78 mm and CDLOC(MRI) = 36.81 ± 1.87 mm. Analyses indicated no significant effect of rater background (F(2, 105) = 0.84; p = 0.437) on CDL estimates. Imaging modality, on the other hand, significantly affected CDL (F (1, 105) = 20.70; p < 0.001), whereby estimates obtained using MRI were 0.89 mm larger than those obtained using fpVCT. CONCLUSION: No effect of rater background on CDL estimates could be identified, suggesting that comparable measurements could be obtained by personnel other than specially trained neurootologists. While imaging modality (fpVCT vs. MRI) did impact CDL results, the difference was small and of questionable clinical significance.

Difference in cochlear length between male and female patients.

Objective: To compare cochlear duct length (CDL) between male and female patients by evaluating the diameter of the basal turn (distance A) on CT scans.Method: All temporal bone CT scans performed between 2014 and 2020 were reviewed in our medical center. Using multiplanar reconstructions, the length A, which is the greatest distance of the basal turn was measured on both sides. We performed an analysis of variance considering two factors: sex and side. Two different physicians carried out the measurements, an otolaryngologist and a neuroradiologist. The patients who had several CT scans allowed us to evaluate the reliability of our procedure.Results: Among the 888 CT scans reviewed, 8 were excluded because of cochlear malformations. The inter-sex difference of length A was found to be 0.29 millimeters(mm) 95% IC [0.26-0.34] and was longer in the male group (p < 0.0001). Using Alexiades' equation, we found that CDL was 34.5mm [34.37-34.61] in the male group and 33.3mm [33.13-33.38] in the female group. When one side was compared to the other, there was no significant difference (p = 0.226). An intra-class correlation found a good absolute agreement between the two screeners of 0.79.Conclusion: Males have a statistically significant longer CDL than females.

[Cochlear Implantation: Evaluation of Cochlear Duct Length (CDL)]. / Cochlea-Implantation: Bestimmung der Cochlear Duct Length (CDL).

Personalized care in the context of cochlear implantation is becoming increasingly important. Choosing the right electrode could improve speech understanding. The measurement of the cochlear length plays an important role: preoperatively, in order to select a suitable electrode length; postoperatively, on the one hand to check the correct electrode position, on the other hand to enable anatomically based fitting of the electrode contacts. Of the various possible localizations of the CDL measurements within the cochlear turns, the one on the organ of Corti (CDLOC) is the most frequently used and clinically most important. In the CDL measurement, a direct and indirect evaluation can be distinguished. There is also the possibility of reconstructing and measuring the CDL in 3D and calculating it mathematically, e.g. using spiral equations. In this context, measurements based on radiological imaging are gaining increasing importance. Therefore, if there is the possibility of performing higher-resolution imaging, this should be strived preoperatively in order to enable the most precise possible procedure and thus a good outcome. Otological planning software can help to create an interface between new findings regarding CDL measurement and higher-resolution imaging for an individualized cochlear implantation.

Precise evaluation of the postoperative cochlear duct length by flat-panel volume computed tomography - Application of secondary reconstructions.

OBJECTIVE: There is still a lack in precise postoperative evaluation of the cochlea because of strong artifacts. This study aimed to improve accuracy of postoperative two-turn (2TL) and cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements by applying flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT), secondary reconstruction (fpVCTSECO) and three-dimensional curved multiplanar reconstruction. METHODS: First, 10 temporal bone specimens with or without electrode were measured in multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT), fpVCT and fpVCTSECO and compared to high-resolution micro-CT scans. Later, pre- and postoperative scans of 10 patients were analyzed in a clinical setting. RESULTS: Concerning 2TL, no statistically significant difference was observed between implanted fpVCTSECO and nonimplanted micro-CT in 10 temporal bone specimens. In contrast, there was a significant discrepancy for CDL (difference: -0.7 mm, P = 0.004). Nevertheless, there were no clinically unacceptable errors (±1.5 mm). These results could be confirmed in a clinical setting. Using fpVCTSECO, CDL was slightly underestimated postoperatively (difference: -0.5 mm, P = 0.002) but without any clinically unacceptable errors. CONCLUSION: fpVCTSECO can be successfully applied for a precise measurement of the cochlear lengths pre- and postoperatively. However, users must be aware of a slight systematic underestimation of CDL postoperatively. These results may help to refine electrode selection and frequency mapping.

Influence of electrode to cochlear duct length ratio on post-operative speech understanding outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the pre-operative electrode to cochlear duct length ratio (ECDLR), is associated with post-operative speech recognition outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The study included sixty-one adult CI recipients with a pre-operative computed tomography scan and a speech recognition test 12 months after implantation. INTERVENTIONS: The average of two raters' cochlear duct length (CDL) measurements and the length of the recipient's cochlear implant electrode array formed the basis for the electrode-to-cochlear duct length ratio (ECLDR). Speech recognition tests were compared as a function of ECDLR and electrode array length itself. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The relationship between ECDLR and percent correct on speech recognition tests. RESULTS: A second order polynomial regression relating ECDLR to percent correct on the CNC words speech recognition test was statistically significant, as was a fourth order polynomial regression for the AzBio Quiet test. In contrast, there was no statistically significant relationship between speech recognition scores and electrode array length. CONCLUSIONS: ECDLR values can be statistically associated to speech-recognition outcomes. However, these ECDLR values cannot be predicted by the electrode length alone, and must include a measure of CDL.

Fully Automated Measurement of Cochlear Duct Length From Clinical Temporal Bone Computed Tomography.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To present and validate a novel fully automated method to measure cochlear dimensions, including cochlear duct length (CDL). STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The computational method combined 1) a deep learning (DL) algorithm to segment the cochlea and otic capsule and 2) geometric analysis to measure anti-modiolar distances from the round window to the apex. The algorithm was trained using 165 manually segmented clinical computed tomography (CT). A Testing group of 159 CTs were then measured for cochlear diameter and width (A- and B-values) and CDL using the automated system and compared against manual measurements. The results were also compared with existing approaches and historical data. In addition, pre- and post-implantation scans from 27 cochlear implant recipients were studied to compare predicted versus actual array insertion depth. RESULTS: Measurements were successfully obtained in 98.1% of scans. The mean CDL to 900° was 35.52 mm (SD, 2.06; range, [30.91-40.50]), the mean A-value was 8.88 mm (0.47; [7.67-10.49]), and mean B-value was 6.38 mm (0.42; [5.16-7.38]). The R2 fit of the automated to manual measurements was 0.87 for A-value, 0.70 for B-value, and 0.71 for CDL. For anti-modiolar arrays, the distance between the imaged and predicted array tip location was 0.57 mm (1.25; [0.13-5.28]). CONCLUSION: Our method provides a fully automated means of cochlear analysis from clinical CTs. The distribution of CDL, dimensions, and cochlear quadrant lengths is similar to those from historical data. This approach requires no radiographic experience and is free from user-related variation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:449-458, 2022.

CT imaging-based approaches to cochlear duct length estimation-a human temporal bone study.

OBJECTIVES: Knowledge about cochlear duct length (CDL) may assist electrode choice in cochlear implantation (CI). However, no gold standard for clinical applicable estimation of CDL exists. The aim of this study is (1) to determine the most reliable radiological imaging method and imaging processing software for measuring CDL from clinical routine imaging and (2) to accurately predict the insertion depth of the CI electrode. METHODS: Twenty human temporal bones were examined using different sectional imaging techniques (high-resolution computed tomography [HRCT] and cone beam computed tomography [CBCT]). CDL was measured using three methods: length estimation using (1) a dedicated preclinical 3D reconstruction software, (2) the established A-value method, and (3) a clinically approved otosurgical planning software. Temporal bones were implanted with a 31.5-mm CI electrode and measurements were compared to a reference based on the CI electrode insertion angle measured by radiographs in Stenvers projection (CDLreference). RESULTS: A mean cochlear coverage of 74% (SD 7.4%) was found. The CDLreference showed significant differences to each other method (p < 0.001). The strongest correlation to the CDLreference was found for the otosurgical planning software-based method obtained from HRCT (CDLSW-HRCT; r = 0.87, p < 0.001) and from CBCT (CDLSW-CBCT; r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Overall, CDL was underestimated by each applied method. The inter-rater reliability was fair for the CDL estimation based on 3D reconstruction from CBCT (CDL3D-CBCT; intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.43), good for CDL estimation based on 3D reconstruction from HRCT (CDL3D-HRCT; ICC = 0.71), poor for CDL estimation based on the A-value method from HRCT (CDLA-HRCT; ICC = 0.29), and excellent for CDL estimation based on the A-value method from CBCT (CDLA-CBCT; ICC = 0.87) as well as for the CDLSW-HRCT (ICC = 0.94), CDLSW-CBCT (ICC = 0.94) and CDLreference (ICC = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: All approaches would have led to an electrode choice of rather too short electrodes. Concerning treatment decisions based on CDL measurements, the otosurgical planning software-based method has to be recommended. The best inter-rater reliability was found for CDLA-CBCT, for CDLSW-HRCT, for CDLSW-CBCT, and for CDLreference. KEY POINTS: • Clinically applicable calculations using high-resolution CT and cone beam CT underestimate the cochlear size. • Ten percent of cochlear duct length need to be added to current calculations in order to predict the postoperative CI electrode position. • The clinically approved otosurgical planning software-based method software is the most suitable to estimate the cochlear duct length and shows an excellent inter-rater reliability.

Implementation of secondary reconstructions of flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT) and otological planning software for anatomically based cochlear implantation.

PURPOSE: For further improvements in cochlear implantation, the measurement of the cochlear duct length (CDL) and the determination of the electrode contact position (ECP) are increasingly in the focus of clinical research. Usually, these items were investigated by multislice computed tomography (MSCT). The determination of ECP was only possible by research programs so far. Flat-panel volume computed tomography (fpVCT) and its secondary reconstructions (fpVCTSECO) allow for high spatial resolution for the visualization of the temporal bone structures. Using a newly developed surgical planning software that enables the evaluation of CDL and the determination of postoperative ECP, this study aimed to investigate the combination of fpVCT and otological planning software to improve the implementation of an anatomically based cochlear implantation. METHODS: Cochlear measurements were performed utilizing surgical planning software in imaging data (MSCT, fpVCT and fpVCTSECO) of patients with and without implanted electrodes. RESULTS: Measurement of the CDL by the use of an otological planning software was highly reliable using fpVCTSECO with a lower variance between the respective measurements compared to MSCT. The determination of the inter-electrode-distance (IED) between the ECP was improved in fpVCTSECO compared to MSCT. CONCLUSION: The combination of fpVCTSECO and otological planning software permits a simplified and more reliable analysis of the cochlea in the pre- and postoperative setting. The combination of both systems will enable further progress in the development of an anatomically based cochlear implantation.

Variation of the cochlear anatomy and cochlea duct length: analysis with a new tablet-based software.

PURPOSE: In cochlear implantation, thorough preoperative planning together with measurement of the cochlear duct length (CDL) assists in choosing the correct electrode length. For measuring the CDL, different techniques have been introduced in the past century along with the then available technology. A tablet-based software offers an easy and intuitive way to visualize and analyze the anatomy of the temporal bone, its proportions and measure the CDL. Therefore, we investigated the calculation technique of the CDL via a tablet-based software on our own cohort retrospectively. METHODS: One hundred and eight preoperative computed tomography scans of the temporal bone (slice thickness < 0.7 mm) of already implanted FLEX28™ and FLEXSOFT™ patients were found eligible for analysis with the OTOPLAN software. Measurements were performed by two trained investigators independently. CDL, angular insertion depth (AID), and cochlear coverage were calculated and compared between groups of electrode types, sex, sides, and age. RESULTS: Mean CDL was 36.2 ± 1.8 mm with significant differences between sex (female: 35.8 ± 0.3 mm; male: 36.5 ± 0.2 mm; p = 0.037), but none concerning side or age. Differences in mean AID (FLEX28: 525.4 ± 46.4°; FLEXSOFT: 615.4 ± 47.6°), and cochlear coverage (FLEX28: 63.9 ± 5.6%; FLEXSOFT: 75.8 ± 4.3%) were significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A broad range of CDL was observed with significant larger values in male, but no significant differences concerning side or age. Almost every cochlea was measured longer than 31.0 mm. Preoperative assessment aids in prevention of complications (incomplete insertion, kinking, tipfoldover), attempt of atraumatic insertion, and addressing individual necessities (hearing preservation, cochlear malformation). The preferred AID of 720° (two turns of the cochlea) was never reached, opening the discussion for the requirement of longer CI-electrodes versus a debatable audiological benefit for the patient in his/her everyday life.